Questions about our reporting, a correction to flag, a responsible-disclosure report, or a partnership in mind? The Threadlinqs team of detection engineers and threat intelligence analysts reads every message.
Spotted something inaccurate, out of date, or incorrectly attributed in a threat report or detection? Tell us — we treat accuracy reports as a priority and update the underlying record. See our editorial standards.
If you have found a security issue in the Threadlinqs platform itself, please report it to us privately at the address above before any public disclosure so we can investigate and remediate.
Interested in source partnerships, data sharing, integrations, or research collaboration? We are always open to working with vendors, researchers, and security teams.
For Gold / Enterprise access, custom requirements, billing questions, or general account support, reach out and we will route you to the right place.
If your question is about how our intelligence is produced, reviewed, or revalidated — including our use of AI and the human-in-the-loop review carried out after posting — the answer is likely already on our Editorial Standards & AI Transparency page. If you want the bigger picture of the platform and who it is for, see the About page.
For the fastest answer on features and tiers, you can also explore the platform directly — the real-time threat feed, detection library, and MITRE coverage map are free on the Blue tier.
See the threat intelligence, detection engineering, and adversary research in action — free on the Blue tier, no credit card required.
[ open_platform ] [ read_research ]